patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

9-Year-Old Charged With Assault After Punching Playground Playmate

Information provided by the Stow Police Department.

 

On Dec. 12, the principal at Indian Trail School called Stow police after a 9-year-old punched another juvenile on the playground, according to a report. 

The 9-year-old boy was playing tag with a group of boys and became angry when the victim tagged him out, the report stated. The boy punched the victim in the face, cutting his eye. 

The principal told police this is a repeated incident and when the boy was brought into the office he began smacking chairs and hitting the walls, the report stated.

Police charged the boy with delinquency by means of assault, unruly behavior and disorderly conduct, the report stated. He was referred to Stow Youth Services.

Related Topics: Assault, Crime, Stow Police Department, Stow Police Department, indian trail school, and stow crime

joe ponikarovsky

8:16 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012

is this what happens nowadays when you get into a fight in school? they call the cops? when i was in school, you'd just get suspended. bad grades and being grounded for months would teach you a lesson more than community service (or whatever youth services might do). sure, if the fight involved a serious intent to injure or a weapon they would get the cops involved, but certainly not for just punching someone and slamming some chairs around.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack Kelly

8:27 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012

I'm sure you can agree, but I don't remember fights happening at elementary schools when we were in school.

But then again, parenting back then was different than it is today with (too many) parents it seems. If we got out of line, we knew what was waiting for us when we got home.

Comment_arrow

Brad Tilton

3:39 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Spoken like a true bully. How many kids did you terrorize in school and receive minimal punishment just for what was considered normal behavior for boys. This is a symptom that needs to be addressed,otherwise he will think this is acceptable behavior and tanscend into accepting that assaulting or murdering as an adult when he is upset is normal behavior in the future

JenniGS

9:13 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012

I can't even wrap my brain around a NINE year old being charged by police for ANYTHING! Kids fight, involving the police is ridiculous! Remember the fear of the paddle in the principal's office? Wow, how things have changed. I feel sorry for educators, no matter what they do, they can get into trouble for the slightest bit of discipline. Yes, Robert...it starts at home, that's all we have left!

Reply

Claudia Mabel Smith

9:52 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012

Bottom Line- my 2 brothers and I knew that whatever punishment the school gave us(this was when the principal could paddle you) wouldn't compare to the punishment that was waiting for us at home.....ouch! But my parents never crossed the line of punishment to abusing us. Seems like the more God is forced out of schools, less parent involvement-it's the schools job to deal with them during the day,single parent families make it even harder on the parent, absentee parents- I never new anyone whose parents didn't know where they were 24/7 in elementary school but when i ask friends of my daughters if they want to use the phone to let their parents know where they are or when I will bring them home the common response is "no thank you" and only one parent has called my home to check up on their child- I call wherever my daughter is and she knows to call me if plans are changing so you take all of this plus everything else which equals the problems we have today as a society.

Reply

Elaine Harding

10:02 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012

I remember kids getting paddled at Indian Trail and also the kids that were bad had to sit in the office during recess. Also I think kids back then also feared their parents and what would happen. We were grounded for things.

Reply

Kristine Vosecky

10:11 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012

Charging a nine-yo with assault? I don't know. It seems it should be taken care of internally in the school. I feel bad for both kids. @JenniG S - yeah - if kids were scared a little more of getting in trouble at school, I bet they'd be slower to break the rules. Ugh. Yes - Home is where it needs to start.

Reply

Kelly Wilson

10:18 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012

Well it sounds like this child has been in trouble before and we don't know all the details. With all that is going on in schools maybe the principle needs to set an example that he has zero tolerance. I don't blame him at all.

Reply

Doug Burley

10:21 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012

Wait a second... So all week, people have been posting comments asking why we don't identify potentially violent kids earlier and why nothing is done to prevent them from harming people. Then, when we have a 9 year old who, according to the article...
1: Punches another child in the face for tagging him out in a game
2: Has a history of similar incidents
3: Threw a violent tantrum, hitting chairs and walls when he was stopped
...people are outraged that the school officials involved the police? Someone needs to teach children like this that their actions have consequences and obviously it's not happening at home. Protecting society from violent people involves identifying escalating violent behavior early, before someone is seriously hurt.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RLK

11:03 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012

Excellent point, Doug! We can't have it both ways.

We can't expect teachers to just handle these situations when they occur over and over. As stated, this child is a repeat offender. It's obvious what the school has done to help teach the child in the past is not working. It's time to bring in another party to deal with it.

Good job done by the principal who had to make the tough call. I'm sure it broke her heart to have to do it.

Comment_arrow

Mary Christine Mohr

8:39 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

I agree with you Doug! After I read the whole article, this is a child that would be tagged as having anger issues. He didn't just hit the other boy while playing, but went on another rampage in the office! Do you think maybe he sees this kind of behaviour at home???? No matter what the problem, this kid needs attention so that we do not see his name in the paper in a few years telling about some incident where he killed people! I don't want that for any kid. And now a days, it's difficult for the school to paddle anyone! The Parents would be there screaming about that, but if he went on a rampage of some sore, the parents would say that the school was at fault. You can't have it both ways.

Comment_arrow

Linda Nelson

7:31 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

I totally agree it's "not happening at home". I cannot believe this poor "aggressor" has a normal, loving home life. I think he should be removed from the home and some service should examine the home and parents. Kids are not normally aggressor if they have a happy, comfortable home. (Mother of four adults and grandmother, thankfully, of seven great grands from 26 to 3 years old who, at this point, are very secure and have never had such an experience.) I truly think the
"aggressor" should be removed from his environmant and place elsewhere(hopefully
better)

Kelly Wilson

10:48 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012

Exactly Doug...and according to the "experts", you need a paper trail of incidents. He is just doing his job.

Reply

Leigh Peterson

11:59 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012

I agree with Doug. And I feel terrible for the boy. Obviously something is going on at home and I hope family services gets involved.

Reply

Jennifer Spigelmire

12:09 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

I have two children at Indian Trail and this is the first time I have heard anything about this! That's a little concerning to me. I do feel the school did the right thing by calling police in and hopefully this will open the child's eyes to consequences of unacceptable behavior and the parent's eyes to the issues going on!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Linda Nelson

7:36 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

This is not "normal" behavior for a child. I definitely feel that the "home life" is not what it should be. Authorities should investiage the situation. Not all parents should be parents.

Ed Fisher

12:17 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

Yep, Doug, can't disagree. It is a shame to involve the police and courts in this, but we must begin identifying problem kids early and documenting these behaviors. Tough spot for the school administrators to be in, but i agree, they went the right direction.

Reply

shewithnoname

3:48 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

There's that IB training for you! Good job, Principal Lacoste! Call the cops on a 9 yr. old ...... good grief. But wait a minute ...... wasn't that student being a "risk-taker"? Oh, gosh, this is NOT going to look good on his IB Learner Profile, whatever will they think of this misfit in Geneva?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack Kelly

3:22 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Where's your proof that IB training has anything to do with this?

Oh. It's just more stupidity you're pulling out of your backside, "shewithnobrain". But your history of stupidity is documented on Patch. Stay stupid cowardly troll.

Gail Harwell

3:48 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

A couple days ago in Utah a 6th grader took a loaded .22 into school & pointed it at classmates during recess. Kids and their parents need to be held responsible, because it has gotten out of hand. I support ZERO tolerance these days. Better to be safe than sorry.

Reply

Melissa Bysura

4:50 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

Excellent point Doug! Shewithnoname, get a life!

Reply

Mindy Davis

8:26 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

This sounds like a very troubled kid. I would suggest that children's services investigate his home environment. It may offer some clues as to why he is so volitile at such a young age. Surely, if there are no obvious signs of problems at home, the parents would agree that he needs help. The sooner the intervention, the sooner this child can get back on the right track, and have a chance for a decent life.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Linda Nelson

7:09 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Totally agree with you. (See my reply above) Not all parents are "loving", unfortunately.

shewithnoname

10:35 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012

1. Were the boy's parents called BEFORE the police were summoned?
2. Was the boy taken out of the school in handcuffs?
3. Does this student have an IEP?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack Kelly

3:23 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

And what were those answers when you called the school?
Too much work, huh? Got it (not that any of that is yours -- or anyone else's -- business). Can you be any MORE stupid?

Melissa Bysura

7:51 am on Friday, December 21, 2012

1. Calls probably went out simultaneously
2. Silly question
3. None of your business, why would you even ask that question?

Reply
Comment_arrow

shewithnoname

9:09 am on Friday, December 21, 2012

@Melissa,

You could have simply answered, "I don't know".

1."Probably" is a guess, not an answer.
2. Asking if a 9 yr. old was handcuffed is a "silly" question? Is it "silly" because of course he was walked to the cop car in cuffs, or is it "silly" because he wasn't?
3. According to IDEA and ADA, students with disabilities who misbehave DUE TO their disability, have to be disciplined under a different set of rules than non-classified students.

Comment_arrow

Jack Kelly

3:24 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Or "shewhotalksoutofherstupidbackside" ---

Since you're clearly highly uneducated, anyone worth their salt (which excludes you) knows that those stupid questions you asked are NONE of yours -- or anyone else's -- business.

Get back in the kitchen, on your knees and clean the floor, troll-hides-behind-a-fake-alias

Melissa Bysura

3:18 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012

@shewithnoname

I could have answered I don't know just like you could ask questions that matter. How would knowing the answer to any of those questions help anything?

This kid is a trouble maker (yes, I have kids at Indian Trail so I can say that), he was FINALLY dealt with appropriately and only time will tell if it changes his normally violent behavior. If it doesn't, next step should be expelltion.

And no, this individual kids bad behavior is not a black eye to the awesome IB program that my children benefit from everyday.

Feliz Navidad!

Reply
Comment_arrow

shewithnoname

10:03 am on Thursday, December 27, 2012

"Expelition"? Is that some new kind of IB punishment? LOL!

Comment_arrow

Melissa Bysura

8:47 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012

Did you really just misspell expelltion? Seems you might benefit from a little IB education you moron!

Comment_arrow

Debbie S.

10:22 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012

Psst...Melissa: the word you are looking for is EXPULSION.

KC Wood

11:03 am on Saturday, December 22, 2012

I have been reading this and if this kid isn't identified as needing help in some way isn't he a future shooter. With the charges come eye's on him and the family, by officials. Sometimes this is the only way for help to be given, as requesting help sometimes falls on deaf ears.

Reply

James Vaughan

2:20 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

... hmmm - I remember that we had a 'bully' in grade school. We all just 'lived with it'.
We were all in fear of him- but I really do not remember any blood-letting he caused. It sounds like this child reached a level of violence- after the playground incident, where the school officials could not cope and the police were an appropriate response. With the repeated history of violence it sounds like this was the last straw.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Linda Nelson

7:16 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012

Isn't that a terrible shame. I don't think that little kids have an inate nature to bully.
The family should definitely be visited by the child welfare people. I suspect that
the parents have serious issues, to say the least.

Leave a comment