Issue 20, a 6.57-mill 10-year operating levy, was passed in Stow by 557 votes Nov. 8.
Here are the final but unofficial voting results from the Summit County Board of Elections:
(39 of 39 precincts counted)
- FOR the levy: 8,047 (51.79 percent)
- AGAINST the levy: 7,490 (48.21 percent)
"We're very apreciateive of the support of the community. We have cut $8 million from budget and reached academic highs that the districts never achieved before in terms of an 'Excellent' rating, all time high ACT scores and being on the AP honor roll," said Superintendent Russ Jones. "I think the community has recognized our 'excellence' in academics and voted to support that — we appreciate that."
Further cuts will not be made, instead busing, in the form of cluster stops, will be instituted for high school students starting Monday.
"We're going to continue to provide the very best education for every child who walks through our doors, that's our mission," said Jones.
Ed Kent
11:30 pm on Tuesday, November 8, 2011
So, I wonder if those 7490 voters can get the issue back on the ballot like the school board did when they didn't get their 'for' vote the first time voters voted on this? Does anyone know if that is permitted or are schools treated differently than voters?
Mike Wright
12:21 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Ed the ship has sailed. I'm Just Sayin.........................................................................
lissa bailey
1:55 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
I actually haven't read anything from Ed that sounds 'right wing'. In fact, if you'd been following his comments for a number of months you'd know that he's more of a Libertarian, votes for both Democrat and Republican and does his own research instead of just believing whatever any news outlet states online, on TV or in papers. His reference about dead tree editions (newspapers) sounds like he's also somewhat of an environmentalist.
Why am I even responding to someone without a name 'tmachine2' who's going to get flagged and their comments removed anyhow? Never mind.
lissa bailey
3:05 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Mike's comment shows the sharp contrast between people's reactions to legitimate questions. In fact, I never read a comment from Ed when the levy failed in August to Mike and others pushing to get the levy back on the ballot that "the ship has sailed..." What if schools had to accept the vote of the people the first time an issue was on a ballot within one year's time? Those that supported this levy would say that isn't fair and that they deserve another shot in the same year. Yet, when the situation is reversed...well, you get the idea don't you? Surely so. These are things to ponder.
Mike Wright
7:25 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Lissa let it go. Move on.
lissa bailey
9:51 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Amanda, there are some on here wishing some of us to move on from this comments forum and don't want to comment anymore or discuss topics of interest here on Stow Patch. Is that what you and Patch.com want also. if you wish me to go away then I can easily do that, but I'll leave that up to you since you're in charge. As you can see from my history I've been respectful in any discussion, but if only certain views are accepted here then I'll gladly move on. Patch seemed like it was going to be a civil place for the sharing of views and ideals.
Leigh Peterson
1:32 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
I'd like to know this too. Why did the school board have to "let it go?"
Ward Benson
2:00 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Leigh, no one commented on Patch that the school should 'let it go' as Mike did to others who wish to comment. And, by law the schools can continue to put the same levy on the ballot up to 3 times even if the voters do not pass it the first or second time. But, those against a levy do not have the same option of continuing to easily get the issue back on the ballot until they get their way. I realize it sounds unbelievable that this can take place in the United States, but the law is the law. Although, the very premise of the way Ohio primarily funds it's education system has been ruled unconstitutional. So far, no one in office that I'm aware of has had the power to change it to create a better and more fair way to bring in revenue. Other states are getting ahead of Ohio with this issue and moving away from property taxes as the main way to fund schools. In fact, one state that has allowed energy drilling on their public lands now has enough income they are considering eliminating property taxes because they have so much revenue. At this point, even though Ohio has a wealth of energy sitting under the ground, certain powerful groups have not allowed drilling yet. Ohio continues to lack revenue, rely on taxing primarily homeowners and can't seem to set it's spending house in order. And that goes for the Governor and those he gave big salaries to. We've just had a lot of poor management no matter which party. The few good officials have had their hands tied. Too bad for Ohio.
Ed Kent
11:33 pm on Tuesday, November 8, 2011
Wow, that money sure came in fast from this levy that they suddenly have the funds to start busing back this Monday! Amazing!
Misty Pawlin
5:57 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Ed, you know as well as I do that the taking away school busing, and upping pay to play fees is the way the school board almost blackmails parents into voting for the levy...and I must say... it's been an effective tool. Too bad people couldn't have said 'no' and demanded cuts that weren't directly aimed at students and parents.
Chris Butts
12:20 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Give it a rest Ed. It's over, Stow's kids won.
Misty Pawlin
5:45 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Last time I checked, Ed still had his right to freedom of speech. Stow kinds didn't win, IB, and the bloated salaries and benefits gravy train won. It's hard to believe how the people in this town were so duped. The school board needed to be sent a strong message about fiscal responsibility, but instead the taxpayers funded the gravy train to keep on rollin'.
And....the ship has not sailed, the school board will be back looking for more money next year, and it will be interesting to see what happens. In the mean time, there are new board members who - if they do what they promised - will start to question the spend thirft ways of the old board.
Leigh Peterson
1:33 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
The levy was voted down already. They didn't give it a rest then. Why should the No voters give it a rest now?
Misty Pawlin
5:52 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
And by the by, although property values were lowered in Summit County, many of the valuations were based on appraisals that were already too high. I have successfully challenged my property taxes and my neighbors property taxes for the three previous valuations - before the latest big drop. I would be more than happy to lend my experience in this matter to anyone who would like to challenge their property taxes on the next go around. Getting you valuation lowered ** only if it really is too high** is a way of giving yourself a property tax cut.
FrankRizzo
7:30 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Give it a rest Misty - it's over.
Monique Rovelsky
5:56 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
I beg to differ. The kids have won, because regardless of where the money truly is going, we would have been the ones to suffer. Thank you Stow, for saving my senior year.
Mike Wright
6:39 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Monique enjoy your Senior year. Stow has a lot to be proud of!
Mike Barnes
3:51 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Monique -- thank you for your help and support. You and your fellow classmates have every right to comment and be heard. You do, after all have "skin in the game"? I am looking forward to seeing Noises Off this weekend -- sorry the levy kept me away from helping you guys!!
Joe Earley
6:10 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Thank you voters of Stow!
Danielle Waskowski
9:31 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
First off Misty I would like to say SHAME ON YOU for attacking a CHILD. She is just expessing her relief over the fact that yes she is right, her senior year would have been directly affected by this levy. Things, like school dances, bet you went to your school dances without a second thought.. well if the schools are closed at 6 pm, how will they hold the dances? What about the drama club and the senior class play? high school musical? All these would have been affected, but you don't stop to think on that... As for the education, when I graduated in 2000, most of the kids that graduated with me became DOCTORS, TEACHERS, OR NURSES. PEOPLE THAT TAKE CARE OF YOUR CHILD'S EDUCATION, AND YOUR HEALTH. One classmate is an OBGYN. So before you go blasting our kids, look at the results.I myself being a former graduate of stow, works on animals surgically, your pets. we need the good education to produce results, we need the better computers, tools, ect to help us succeed in this ever changing world. I have personally grown up with some of the school board members, and most are good people, with honest intentions. I honestly can not speak for all because I don't know everyone.I dont make the huge bucks, but I will gladly support a school levy, these do impact our children... And let's stop the fighting and work together.. if your not happy, either move to a city that does not support it's school's- Akron , or form a comittee to learn more about our schools.. Stop picking on kids.
Misty Pawlin
6:36 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Thank you 48.21 percent of the voters in Stow for saying, 'no'.
Steve Eaton
5:03 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Agree with you on this Danielle, sounds like this Misty character is in attack mode. Not saying to "Get over it" but it looks like Misty may need to quit feeling sorry for herself and act like the adult here. Everyone deals with setbacks and tough times and of course it's difficult to support a levy if you're in that dilemma......but COME ON!!!!!!!!
James Pistorio
9:31 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
""Bulgrin added the levy "won't make us solvent -- it will just [allow us] to limp along."
Board member Denny Mariola said the district would need 10 to 13 mills "to get out of trouble.""
The above is from the April 3, 2011 issue of The Stow Sentry.
They'll be back.
James Thomas
10:53 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Renewal Levy in February,
send a message
VOTE NO.
Mike Barnes
9:35 am on Thursday, November 10, 2011
James -- the renewal is a year from now!! I'll open pandora's box --- What would it take to changfe your mind? Do you have suggestions for better ways to fund Ohio schools? Would you be willing to work on a campaign to make those changes happen?
lissa bailey
11:56 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Misty, please ignore those who've expressed their complete lack of compassion. They haven't yet walked in your shoes and therefore aren't touched by the feelings of your situations. There are some (not all) levy supporters who attacked others by saying those that couldn't vote yes, no matter their circumstance, were just being selfish. But, many voters have had their eyes opened through this process and then to hear that suddenly after the levy vote busing is restored even though they claimed they didn't have money this fall to keep them rolling. A lot of eyes have been opened and more will be opened when they realize that this new tax begins last January 1, 2011 and not in the future. I hope the new board will be very frank with people and not try to spin things. If a tax is retroactive they need to have the guts to say it and have that in their newspaper reports. Many did not know before voting yesterday and are upset and feel like they were deceived. Many others also feel like they were duped because all of a sudden they can roll the buses on Monday even though that new levy money hasn't been collected yet.
I understand Woodridge voters saw through some of the rhetoric and they voted down their new levy. Of course, Stow and Munroe Falls also voted this one down already, but evidently 'no' votes don't count until a district asks 3 times. Of course, as soon as they get one passed, the door is shut on voters to bring it back up. Our system is rigged in favor of big money.
Jake Racketch
10:40 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
I'm just asking, but what does Woodridge's request for levy funding have to do with Stow's? You seem to insinuate that you feel they don't budget their revenue well, like you feel about SMFCSD. Was Woodridge using the same "rhetoric" to which you're referring?
Please know I'm not starting a fight here, I just want to clarify. It seem that lumping two districts together in their requests for different millage, after a different amount of requests, and with different cuts having been made and planned for the future, it would be difficult to draw comparisons.
Karlen Larr
12:19 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
We are so very happy the school issue was voted in. I don't EVER like the idea of curtailing busing - it could be too dangerous for some students. I also don't want the students to suffer in playing a sport. For some students this is their star in life and we need to support that. Kids need sports - you don't want them on the streets causing trouble due to boredom. NOW WITH SOME NEW BOARD MEMBERS LET'S GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER. Think of the kids. Karlen
Misty Pawlin
12:35 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
@lissa baily : Thanks for your kind words.
You are so right; people have been duped. More eyes will be opened when the RETROACTIVE tax bills arrive just after Christmas in mid January.
Now it seems the levy lovers have a new tool. High school students can came come here and post the party line and rhetoric they were force fed by the schools, and if anyone dares to respond they are accused of "ATTACKING A CHILD". I feel bad for the kids because they were used as pawns and lied to. When these kids are a few years older and out in the real world, they will realize how they were used. It's the schools and the school board who should be ashamed of how they used the kids to spread their rhetoric, scaring them by threatening to take away their buses, sports, and after school activities - all of which $55 MILLION could adequately fund,
And for all those saying. "Give it a rest, it's over"...well...it should have been over last August, but it wasn't. And next year they're coming back for more..so no...I'm not giving it a rest.
John Moyer
3:02 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
@ Misty- As Monique's teacher in AP Government and AP Economics, I can assure that she has not been force fed. She is a mature young lady who thinks for herself. I don't think Monique would view herself as a pawn or that she was used. But she is the only one that can answer that question.
Mike Barnes
5:52 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Misty -- did you know the taxes we will pay this February are for the 2011 tax year? The new levy was approved in 2011 so it really is not retroactive. I don't think the district is not trying to scam or cheat us out of additional money!!!
Ed Kent
7:22 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Actually it is considered retroactive.
Retroactive legislation or taxes are by definition effective or operative from a date or for a period in the past. Taxes or legislation that is passed, but does not become effective until the day it passes or at a date in the future are the only kind that are not retroactive. This particular levy did not become effective on the day it was voted on, but became effective on January 1, 2011.
Karen Wright
1:54 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
THANK YOU to our Stow Munroe Falls freshman cheerleaders and their coaches for being part of the levy watch. They cheered the "FOR" vote until the end. Great job!
Amanda Harnocz
1:59 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Did you see the video attached to this post? It's the cheerleaders!
Matt Striner
2:13 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
@lissa bailey--I'm curious--what is it about Misty Pawlin's situation that we would benefit from walking in her shoes? Just askin....
Amanda Harnocz
3:02 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Hi there, I can vouch for Matt Striner. This has always been his username.
Misty Pawlin
3:33 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
EDIT To @ Matt Striner: My apologies for confusing you with the other Matt who made a nasty comment when I said I was ill (said comment having since been deleted by moderators), so lissa's comments may not have made sense to you with his post being gone. I believe her point was, if you have to walk in the shoes of the ill person you just made fun of, it might give you a different perspective, and a little compassion for what they are going through.
lissa bailey
2:46 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Hi Matt. Thank you for asking. Can a person benefit and increase their understanding of others by walking a mile in their shoes? Some would say yes. Can a person who has never experienced what it's like to not have enough income to pay their bills, for any reason such as losing a job, illness or death of a loved one, fully understand a person who's going through that? Since most reasonable people would say their personal understanding is limited in regards to others whose shoes they haven't walked in, they would at least be open minded and show compassion even though they don't fully comprehend. Does that mean a financially well off person should seek poverty in order to understand the plight of others less fortunate? No. What it means is to realize we don't always fully comprehend the feelings of their infirmities and with that awareness we are careful not to put them down or tell them they are wrong or demean them. For instance, a good husband would show compassion for their wife when she's in labor even though he's never walked in her shoes and cannot fully comprehend what she's going through. Those that just claim all those who voted 'no' which is almost half of all residents, are just selfish don't have understanding and in fact lack compassion. While there are levy supporters who would never presume such thoughts and would never try to put others down because they realize there are hurting people who voted against the levy.
Danielle Waskowski
11:50 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
just for the record, i do know what it is like to walk in "your shoes" i lost my entire home to a house fire, losing all the pets inside and alomst losing my children if it werent not for a lifesaver of a grandfather, had to pick my furniture from other friends and kind neighbors when we moved into our new home in stow, had to learn just this year that my daughter has adhd and autism, my son is a severe asthmatic, i am now a single mom dealing with all this on my own except for 4 days a month if i am lucky, and i go to school full time when not working or studying with my children. so no your right, i am one of the "rich ones" i am rich, in knowing that if that levy failed my daughter would lose programs that are vital to her development, that i was not risking her lose. that my son will need as he hits kindergarten next year and has to stay after in the after school program till i can get off work to get there for him and his sister. every morning i walk my daughter to her classroom and hug her goodbye. i volunteer in her class, and even though i dont have much i support these kids as much as i can because every time i mention i am from stow to another person in a different school system, they mention oh wow those schools are great. and i beam with pride knowing my kids are going to a school known for its great schooling, and if i have to pay a little bit more a year in taxes to make sure of that, then i will proudly do so, like my parents did for my brother and i.
lissa bailey
6:34 am on Thursday, November 10, 2011
That's so wonderful that you've been blessed with a new home and you're able to go to college and most of all that your children were saved from that fire. My cousin's 3 children died in a fire, but she's doing better now after many surgeries.
my neighbor, who did have a nice new home is losing her's now. She lost her job and her husband left. I have relatives in Stow that are losing their home because they don't have enough income to pay all their bills since healthcare and now taxes are going up. No, I don't know what it's like to walk in their shoes either since we've been able to keep up by both working 7 days a week. Our next day off will just be Christmas Day, but at least I won't lose my home. Now that this increase is due in 3 months we're going to try to get extra hours,more nights at our extra jobs so we can pay that. I'm thankful we have the health to do that.
Steve Eaton
3:27 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Congratulations to all whom voted for the Levy! I believe it has been since 02' since it last passed. Good to see, go Stow!!
Misty Pawlin
8:50 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
@ Steve Eaton - Did you even bother to read what I wrote, or were you just going by Danielle? If you had read for content you would have seen I was merely responding to a post. Attacking other posters is not allowed here, so my post would have been mod-deleted if deemed inappropriate.
@ John Moyer: Do you deny teachers encouraged students to get their parents to support the levy. How many "LAST CHANCE TO SAVE OR SCHOOLS' propaganda fliers did the schools send out? You even had the Stow cheerleaders cheering on the election night results. If a high school student wants to post here, then we are allowed to respond to those posts. As you said yourself, she is a "mature young lady" not a "child".
The proof is in the pudding. There was supposedly no money for busing, but as soon as the levy passed, the buses will start rolling on Monday before a penny of this levy is collected. The tactics of the school board to intimidate parents and students into supporting levies by cutting basic services that directly affect them is despicable.
FrankRizzo
9:02 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
There is a significant amount of pent up anger here
Misty Pawlin
9:02 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
@ Ricky Stowater (Interesting last name, by the way)
I'm talking about money going to student programs first, since everyone on the school board pretends the students are top priority. In reality, when the budget is broken down, the vast majority of taxpayer dollars go not to the students, but to support administrative and school employee salaries and benefits.
I can see the writing on this wall here literally. The pro levy lovers are out in force and ganging up on people who are against the levy. Keep at it if it amuses you. I am not intimidated on iota. I don't care if it's 50 to one. I will continue to voice my opinion.
Jake Racketch
10:48 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
The vast majority of all public school districts' budgets (and most budgets of any institution or business) is salary and benefits. SMFCSD is no different.
If such money is going toward staffing (the teachers that educate the students and run/advise/coach the student programs), how are the dollars NOT going to the students? Where, exactly, do you suggest that school district revenues DO go to best benefit the students?
Ricky Stowater
9:31 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Thanks lissa..I mean Misty. My birth name is Richard but I go by Ricky.
What student programs are you referring to that the money should go to? Are you suggesting that taxpayer dollars should go towards nonacademic programs such as sports and other extracurriculars? Jake make a point when saying that when the dollars go to those educating the students, the money is technically going to the students. In what other way should the money be spent to be "going to the students"?
And pro levy voters aren't ganging up on people that are against the levy. I'm not ganging up on Ward or Ed. Frank really said it best. YOU turn this issue, and every issue, into an emotional argument every....single....time you post on Patch. At least people like Ward and Ed stick to the facts, use logic and do not let emotion get in the way of having a big mouth. I at least have respect for Ed Kent and Ward Benson as they spend their time sticking to the facts, looking at numbers and not running their mouths continuously bashing and hating on the people that are educating our children and grandchildren. You would really benefit from listening to and practicing the saying "If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all".
Joe Earley
10:20 am on Saturday, November 12, 2011
Misty, all I see from you are negative opinions. I have yet to see a post where you make any type of recommendation on how you would address your issues.
FrankRizzo
9:15 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Sorry Misty - I don't think it is ganging up on people against the levy, I think it is more ganging up on someone that should practice a bit of silence.
Chris Butts
10:45 am on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Well said Frank.
Misty Pawlin
11:42 am on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Frank: Maybe you should keep silent since you are adding nothing but color commentary to the discussion.
Karen Wright
9:17 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
The cheerleaders came because they wanted to celebrate the EXCELLENT school district that we have and as always, they were Awesome!! Along with the cheerleaders were many Excellent employees (yes, even teachers!!) and community members that know the value of education. The pudding you speak of tastes great because the proof is that the levy passed and it's our school district and our community that benefit.
Steve Eaton
10:30 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Well Said,
I hope that I click on this discussion in 6 months and Misty is still speaking gibberish.
Misty, you are wrong, voice your opinion but you are way off, good luck to yourself.
Mike Wright
8:23 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Mike I have to say she is a special lady. I am truly blessed.
Ricky Stowater
9:33 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
The teachers in SMF schools are Excellent??? I thought they were blood sucking leaches sucking the taxpayers dry.
Mike Eckart
10:52 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011
I'm glad the levy watch went well and had something to celebrate! If not for the PTA meeting at Kimpton, I'd have been there to celebrate with everyone. Thanks for all you do for the schools Mrs. Wright!
Karen Wright
8:11 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Thank you too Mike!
Misty Pawlin
11:52 am on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Yes, Frank, there is significant anger in me - as there is in many others - but it's not pent up. I predict that there will be even more anger expressed when people realize this tax is retroactive in January. I also predict there will be a lot more homes up for sale and people going into foreclosure because they can't afford to live here anymore. Come back in six months Steve, and see if I'm still "speaking gibberish" or if I'm right.
FrankRizzo
1:25 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Thank you to the 51.79% for voting 'yes' and having the vision to look long term at a situation. .....and thank you Patch for allowing me to add this colorful commentary.
Chris Butts
10:44 am on Saturday, November 12, 2011
Hahaha, love it Frank. I enjoy your commentary and it's use of colors.
Amanda Harnocz
1:47 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
We don't want any commenters/users to ever leave. Like I've always said: we want every and all opinions shared here as long as they follow our rules: http://patch.com/A-n8tT
Ward Benson
2:07 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
So, how does one close their account if they want to? I'm curious even though I may not leave. That option should be made available to anyone who joins any site. In fact, isn't it law? Where is the option on our account page? If it's there I can't find it. I know others who closed their facebook accounts out of safety concerns because of harrassment. Others leave for other safety concerns for their family. Without the option to close your account on Patch it may actually stop some people from wanting to join in.
Ed Kent
2:36 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Can you close your Patch account?
"you can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave." -Eagles
I don't think it's possible. You're stuck here.
Joe Earley
10:23 am on Saturday, November 12, 2011
LOL. Good one Ed.
Molly Emery
3:33 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Ward, they are free to leave. Its ok
Ed Kent
3:50 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
I would expect a higher standard of discourse from Molly. After all, she's supposed to be representing The Stow Excellence in Education Foundation.
Board members are Molly Emery, president; Lori Vitt, vice president; Rick Archer, treasurer; and John Harris, trustee.
Mike Barnes
4:53 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
I guess I struggle with understanding why anyone would want to stay in any community that made them so angry and upset! It can't be healthy and if the financial burden is also too great wouldn't leaving make the most sense. Plus if you don't like the schools or think they are not worth the extra taxes – wouldn’t you want to cut your losses and move someplace more suitable to a given lifestyle. I don't think it is being elitist to suggest someone move if they are that unhappy. I think it would be very hard to convince the majority in a community they should accept a lower educational or community standard for the benefit of those who won't or can't pay for the services they enjoy using! BTW the 2009 per capita income for Munroe Falls was $30,326 with an average home value of $166,193 and Stow $29,280 and $169,706. The March 2011 unemployment rate for Munroe Falls was 8.8% and Stow was 7.7 % -- Ohio was 9.0% Hardly an elitist community – but a great place to live especially for those who want to take part in making it an even better place to live. Love it or leave it but for Pete’s sake don’t let it keep ruining your day!!!!
lissa bailey
6:34 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
And your reasons for people moving are indeed happening as Ohio continues to lose population even though births are taking place. People are moving away and yet there are some who are not only fine with that, but encourage it. Most of the commenters that have expressed their opposition to the levy have not complained in the way you suggest, but have expressed their discontent over their own financial situations which are now going to be worse. Why would people who represent a levy committee or any organization that has fundraisers tarnish their reputations in the way I've seen on here. I'm sure there are people who supported the levy who don't want to be associated with some on here who've been kicking people when they're already down. Amanda already wrote a letter to eveyone about this behavior. I believe some of you will get what you wished for and many will just see Patch as a place where organizations come to put people down who don't agree with them. A place 'used' by representatives of organizations who may not be completely representing what their organization truly believes. A place of class warfare. Even after the levy gets passed (after it was defeated) you still question people's motives and suggest they just leave since they can't afford to live here. Why not try to be understanding, show a little compassion, suggest ways they could get assistance from the county or even real estate attorney's to help them. No, instead you berate, belittle and try to crush them.
Michael Rhea
7:52 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
lissa- The population of Ohio is not decreasing. Many people assume that to be the case because we may lose a representative based on population. We have increased population, just not as much as other states.
I can't imagine a city anywhere that does not have someone struggling financially. So, if there is 1 person who cannot afford a levy, does an entire city decrease taxes to the level that they can afford? If not, what number of people unable to afford the levy is the "cut off" for when it is ok to pass a levy? I guess I would think that is why we vote and majority rules. There will never be a time when everyone will be in favor.
Misty Pawlin
6:12 am on Friday, November 11, 2011
@ FrankRizzo - You sir, are the one who need to raise the bar to a higher standard, and I suggest you start be improving your reading comprehension skills. No where did I run down the City of Stow. Now the school board, darn skippy, yes I did. It was no accident that several members of the school board got the boot.
@ Mike Barnes - You don't understand how people who are struggling to get by and are out of work can't move? Who would give me a mortgage if I could move? Lots of people have left Stow because it was too expensive to live here, but right now I'm in no position to do so. Besides, why, just because I think the schools are wasting a huge budget, should I leave time? Stow, love it or leave it? No, love it but admit it has its faults, and stay and try to change it for the better....by insisting on fiscal responsibility!
Dean Marchok
5:18 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
We all need stop complaining about the levy and get down to business in seeking the needed cuts that already should have been done and still need to be. We still need to close Highland and reduce our staff. At our peak in 2006, we had 6000 students, today; we have fewer than 5400 students. This summer the board had a chance to save over 100,000 dollars by changing the Healthcare policy that allows 7 married couples in our district to take two family healthcare plans instead of sharing 1 healthcare plan. This would have saved the district 2 1/2 times the amount (40,000) they claimed they would have saved cutting busing. Why wasn't this done. Just because this levy passed we still need to make the necessary cuts.
Misty Pawlin
6:26 am on Friday, November 11, 2011
@ Dean - I would say "Here, here", or "Well said", but these phrases have already been used here ad nauseum. The whole school bus cutting flim-flam has been used before to scare voters into voting for the levy, and it's a drop in the budget compared to the cuts that should have been made - ones like you suggest. A good start would be purchasing a less expensive insurance plan for public workers just as the private sector has had to do. That would save the schools far in excess of $400,000.
The fact of the matter is, the private sector can no longer afford to support the public sector's over-generous benefits. The public sector spending MUST be brought under control and put more in line with the private sector.
Chris Butts
10:52 am on Saturday, November 12, 2011
Not sure why my comment previous was removed. What I stated was that closing a school is a ridiculous recommendation. Love to see your source for your numbers Dean. Enrollment over the ENTIRE school system may be down but I am willing to bet if you break it down most of the down numbers are for the high school and middle school. I would be shocked if the elementary schools enrollments are down from 2006. So your claim for closing a elementary school does not hold water. Not only lack of facts is a problem here, but how does sending 350 kids into other elementary schools and increasing class sizes do any good? How does the potential for unemployment for these staff members of this school help the local economy? You are worried about $20/month more in tax but putting someone out of a job is OK?? Don't get your "facts" from the stow idiocracy web site. There is nothing credible about that web site.
Dean Marchok
7:41 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Lisa, I believe we all need to give solutions to this matter and try to figure out what move we need to take next, We are not out of debt, this districtis still just holding on. I for one do not want them to come again in a couple of years for more money. Remember, Bulgrin added " the levy won't make us solvent--it will just allow us to limp along". Board member, Denny Mariola, said the district would need 10 to 13 mills to get out of trouble". Stow Sentry, April 3, 2011. Thanks, James Pistorio!
lissa bailey
7:43 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011
Be careful Dean. They'll call you a complainer and then try to find out where you live, how much you make or how much your property is worth. Some on here will have you on their Patch radar to berate everything you say that has to do with living within a budget or making adjustments in expenses since student enrollment has dropped. They'll tell you to move since they feel empowered by the 51 percent vote. They seem to want 49 percent of Stow and Munroe Falls to move south. They don't want us even discussing this on Patch. They want to silence you and many others. I feel like this site is wasting my time and I wish to close my account. I've got more work hours coming anyhow which will help me with the additional taxes that I have to pay from the first half of 2011 that I didn't know I'd have to pay until this levy passed. We live on a tight monthly budget. I enjoyed visiting Patch at different times as a little break and to express what I and about half of the other residents felt about this levy. But, the way we've witnessed some people act on here even after they got what they wanted on the second try has really been disappointing. I hope others reading StowPatch from outside Stow don't think we're all without compassion for some of our struggling residents.
Amanda, please close my account immediately. There does not seem to be a way to do that or it has not been made public. I will not comment on here and also wish for my profile page and account to be deleted.
Misty Pawlin
6:31 am on Friday, November 11, 2011
I just love the way all the Bill O'Reillys here have made lissa and me the stars of this board; mentioned by almost every poster. And why? Because we dare to state our opinions which differ from the party line.
Misty Pawlin
7:00 am on Friday, November 11, 2011
LEVY SURVIVAL MANUAL - Part 2
2. Homestead Exemption : The Homestead Exemption is available to homeowners who are 65 years or older or totally disabled under the age of 65. Surviving spouse of a qualified homeowner who was at least 59 years old on the date of their spouse’s death is also eligible. You must be the owner of the home or manufactured home and it must be your primary residence on January 1 for the tax year you apply......................Under the new program every senior citizen or permanently disabled homeowner will receive an exemption of $25,000 on the market value of their home from property taxes, regardless of their income.
http://fiscaloffice.summitoh.net/index.php/homestead-exemption
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When the next valuation rolls around, we will be advising people how they can legitimately challenge their property tax assessments and have a good chance of winning. The caveat here is that your house must really be over assessed, and you have to prove it. I have had great success with this, and I would be glad to assist anyone who needs help.
Steve Eaton
12:23 pm on Friday, November 11, 2011
@Misty- Stating that we want Field Trips and lower Pay to Play fees, more access to extra-curricular activities and Busing is something we should all want for our kids in Stow. its worth the extra $ to make sure that they have this. I understand what you are arguing but the kids benefit from this tremendously.
Thanks
Chris Butts
3:52 pm on Friday, November 11, 2011
It's most often the people without kids (and often more specifically seniors) who make the most ridiculous claims on what should be cut from the schools, or what things our kids should be able to do without. If you don't want to support a community that is growing and has a vested interest in raising our kids the best way possible. It's pretty simple - MOVE. I will recommend a good realtor for you.
Misty Pawlin
6:07 pm on Friday, November 11, 2011
Whoa.....you are a piece of work, ranking on senior citizens. Moving isn't easy, especially for the elderly. All I can say is Karma Chris, karma. It has a strange way of coming back to bite you on the butt(s). Seniors and every taxpayer have the right to give their opinion on what they think should be cut whether you agree with it or not. Me, I'd start chopping Russ Jones' salary, and take away his bonus. Bonus for what?? Blowing $39,000 on the August levy?
Psst...P.S. The community - as least as far as the schools go - is getting smaller. Empty and foreclosed houses all over town, half deserted plazas. Yep that's growth.
Misty Pawlin
4:14 pm on Friday, November 11, 2011
Steve, no one wants to see these things cut, it's just that we feel $55 million is a sufficient amount of money to pay for all this. Look how they blew $39,000 on the August levy without batting an eyelash! Who is accountable for making that poor business decision? Our school board, rather than take pay cuts or cut benefits as the private sector has had to do, continue to spend our money like it is never going to run out. Sooner or later - probably sooner - the board is going to have to make real cuts, not paper cuts aimed at hurting students and parents to get votes. It's a given; spending can't go on this way. They scraped this levy through, but I don't think the threat of cutting busing is going to work a third time, especially when as soon as they got what they wanted, the buses will be running on Monday. Lots of people feel they were played.
People out of work or on a fixed income are going to be in a lot of financial trouble come January trying to pay for this levy that is RETROACTIVE. You watch, it'll go radioactive and burn a hole through what's left of the property values in this town. And if the Bush tax cuts are allowed to expire, look for more misery. The timing couldn't be worse:
Why Your Tax Bill Might Surge Next Year
http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2011/11/07/why-your-tax-bill-might-surge-next-year/#ixzz1dQqiIvcR
Chris Butts
10:36 am on Saturday, November 12, 2011
Don't be so dramatic Misty. I'm not "ranking" on anyone. Just stating facts. As far as karma goes I am not worried. Those who should worry are the ones who vote against what is in the best interest for our kids and their education. Everyone does have the right to their opinion. Never said they didn't, again, overly dramatic. Half empty plazas have nothing to do with the city, it's not up to the city to provide reasonable rates for lease or a plaza that has seen some kind of upkeep in the last decade. Where do you even get your numbers for $39k? Please give me a source? Or is it again the Stow idiots web site? Do you even have any kids in the school system?
Misty Pawlin
8:43 pm on Saturday, November 12, 2011
@ Chris Butts - Get a clue! Maybe you should go back and read what you wrote. You suggested that senior citizens should move out of Stow if they don't want - or CAN'T AFFORD to support your kid's education at the level YOU think they should. Maybe some of us have, what is to us, more important things to pay for like food, housing, and medical care. I quote from YOUR heartless post, "It's most often the people without kids (***and often more specifically seniors***) who make the most ridiculous claims on what should be cut from the schools......It's pretty simple - MOVE. I will recommend a good realtor for you."
The last line isn't even witty; it's pathetic; HARSH and HEARTLESS in the extreme. Fortunately, you represent only a small group levy supporters. I can't imagine the majority who supported the levy would want anything to do with your comments.
Apparently, in the Chris Butts' world, people are entitled to their opinion, but if they don't want to vote your way, THEY SHOULD MOVE. Seniors on a fixed income should uproot themselves and move. That is a post that will live in infamy (thanks to screen shots), and has already lit a fire under a lot of people who don't know how to use a computer, but were shown what you wrote.
Misty Pawlin
8:49 pm on Saturday, November 12, 2011
@ Chris Butts ..and to finish: The wasted $39,000 is matter of public record. In your haste to chastise me about being overly "dramatic", you failed to say what you thought of my idea to starting cutting expenses by cutting Russ Jones salary and bonus. So Chris, what do you think about that? Does 'Dr. Can't Live Within a Budget' deserve a six figure salary and a BONUS?? I say NO!!
And by the by, half empty plazas have everything to do with the health of the city. Stow is no where near thriving.
FrankRizzo
9:12 pm on Saturday, November 12, 2011
Let's cut Dr. Jones down to minimum wage - wait she still wouldn't be happy with that.
PS - Hi Lissa & Ward I know your still looking.......
Molly Emery
12:12 pm on Sunday, November 13, 2011
No when the voters came out, and there were tons this time, the levy one...Majority rules.... the supporters are huge not a small group. You need to get a clue. its OVER im sure you can find something else to complain about
Misty Pawlin
8:52 am on Monday, November 14, 2011
Hey Molly:
How come it wasn't OVER last August after we voted the first time? I will continue to discuss/ complain - whichever you prefer to call it. February isn't that far away, and we've got greedy hands grasping for the taxpayers purse yet again very soon. You'd do well to keep this in mind, I shall post what I please, not what pleases you.
@ Frank Rizzo - So what do you think of Russ Jones' salary and benefits - that is, if you can fit any meaningful dialogue in between your less than witty repartee.
And just so you know, it wouldn't please me to see Russ Jones receive minimum wage. It would please me to see him leave the district altogether. Too bad the Aurora school system didn't hire him when he tried to jump ship!
FrankRizzo
11:15 am on Monday, November 14, 2011
Misty - haven't looked but my guess his salary & benefits are in line with other superitendents in the county and area. It cracks me up a number of people keep calling for his a Bulgrins salary to be cut.
YOUR BEST FRIEND
7:14 pm on Sunday, November 13, 2011
no ,molly it wasn't the levy that made people come out to vote it was issue 2.when people are threaten to take things away that people count on to get there kids to and from school to get an education what happens if there are no kids in school because they can't get there who suffers the teachers not!!! but that doesn't matter as long as teachers get there pay ? taxpayers should vote down the renewal in feb
Mike Barnes
9:56 am on Monday, November 14, 2011
So Jeff -- I assume you have a job. I assume you work for money too? I also assume you work for a business that can generate more revenue by increasing sales! Schools don’t generate money – they are big consumers of our money – not a surprise to most people. So Jeff how would you propose we fund schools so the districts don’t have to come back to voters on a regular basis? How would you suggest the district make cuts without really cutting? Was the treat of cutting busing really a treat or just a promise to make tough cuts to save money? What would the district gain by wanting to cut busing to make you pay more? The traffic jams and inconvenience also affects them. I don’t think closing the schools early makes life any easier for anyone. So Jeff , share your good ideas and become part of the solution! Bring Misty and any of the others with you! The alternative is to continue the cheap shots while whining and wallowing in self pity!!! I hope you guys have the strength to do the former
Mike Barnes
9:39 am on Monday, November 14, 2011
Misty & Jeff -- where do you guys get your information! The renewal will be on the November 2012 ballot! Because of how Ohio schools are funded aren’t school districts pretty much obligated to keep trying to pass levies? The state continues to push program costs back onto local school districts. Some of those costs have been offset by nearly 8 million dollars in cuts, employee reductions, and things like pay to play. The 6.5 million from the new levy only keeps the district afloat. Remember each year inflation take a percentage of that money. Each year operating costs rise. I don’t think Dr. Jones or Catherine Bulgrin are overpaid. I suggest doing a little research and I think you will find other smaller districts pay more! In addition I am very confident you would find the average CEO and CFO for a $55 million dollar business with 600 employees, 13 buildings etc etc will be making substantially more!! In addition – in the last 5 years the current administration and the school board have -- in my opinion – corrected many of wrongs we endured under the previous board. One last personal thought – I wouldn’t blame the treasurer or the superintendent for looking elsewhere. These people have contracts and seem to be committed to full filling their obligations. I think they have done a good job and I think it would be foolish to even consider buying out their contracts.
YOUR BEST FRIEND
12:01 pm on Monday, November 14, 2011
MIKE,you keep referring to the 8 million in cuts ,from all the people on this sight and at the meetings ask questions about them .MY question is the paper work on the cut like .who was cut , unemployment records, or any paper trail of any ofthis?i know it was on the sos but anybody can just write things down and say isaved this amount.is there any paper trail?Well nordonia school is looking for a superitendant lets see how long it take for jones toput his resume in ? like he did for independance schools .and yes i have a job .i think taxpayers should vote down all renwals for thenext 10 years.if any come up
Mike Barnes
1:23 pm on Monday, November 14, 2011
Jeff --- I suggest going back through the board minutes for the last six years. Its easy to do. Download the minutes and then do searches using "retirement" and "resignation". The results will give you a good start. Like I said before who could blame any employee in the district for not looking elsewhere --- I don't think they are overpaid and I do think they have done a good job with the resources and support they have. They can all resign and the long term financial problems are still not solved. They can all take bigger pay cuts -- the long term financial problem is still with us. So Jeff --- what are you personally going to change it?
Misty Pawlin
12:53 pm on Monday, November 14, 2011
@ Mike Barnes: The point is, there is going to be another levy on the ballot next year, so you better believe we'll keep talking about it. Interesting that you mentioned Bulgrin. Wasn't she hired for something like 20 grand more than her predecessor? ....and at a time of great fiscal crisis. Then there's the IB program that a lot of parents didn't want. But Dr. Dolittle must have his way, and he wants IB. These are the kind of things that make taxpayers furious. It was no accident that two incumbents were voted off the school board. The Bulgrin brouhaha went a good way towards helping them get the boot.
The point you make about the salary of a CEO of a $55M company, kind of answers itself. Schools aren't a $55, business bringing in money, but they cost a fortune, The administrators aren't going to be paid anywhere near what a for profit company would be pay. Having said that, a six figure salary, with bonus and a very lucrative benefits package is a darn good job in this economy. I wouldn't want buy out Russ' contract, I'd like to see him leave of his own accord, as he already tried to do.
Mike Barnes
1:37 pm on Monday, November 14, 2011
Misty & Jeff -- about 10% of voters will vote for a school levy just because it is for the schools. Ten percent of voters will vote against a school levy because they can! Another 10% will vote for or against it for personal reasons --- bad experience - vendetta whatever. Ten percent will vote yes or no because they aren't sure and one or the other appears first on the ballot. That leaves about half that require some type of re-enforcement to vote Yes or No. The answers you seek are available but at some point don't you need to be willing to believe the results? My gut feeling is both of you are in the second 10% -- which is a shame because you both seem passionate about the issue and the energy you waste on viewing the world through your backside could used doing something positive!!
Misty Pawlin
2:33 pm on Monday, November 14, 2011
@Mike Barnes: One starts to read your latest post, and it sounds like you have something constructive to say, but then you ruin it all with your last sentence which I quote here: "My gut feeling is both of you are in the second 10% -- which is a shame because you both seem passionate about the issue and the energy you waste on VIWEING THE WORLD THROUGH YOUR BACKSIDE could [sic] used doing something positive!!"
A very unworthy comment that just makes you look bad. By the way, I am doing something positive for myself. I am managing - just barely - to keep my head above water and stay solvent.
You've left one really important factoid out of your percentages, and that would be the number of people who simply cannot afford to vote for the levy. What is of over-riding importance to me is to be able to keep a roof over my head, buy food and clothing, keep the lights and heat on, and pay my medical bills. Your children's band, field trips, sports, dances, and school buses pale in comparison. My survival takes first priority.
Misty Pawlin
2:39 pm on Monday, November 14, 2011
Another thing Mike, what you and everyone else who is so pro-levy should realize is that it is in your best interest and the best interest of the over-all health of the City of Stow that those of us who are struggling stay solvent. If people lose their homes, or can't pay their taxes, no amount of levy approval is going to keep the schools on track. Houses sold at Sheriff's auctions and though bank foreclosure do tremendous damage to property values. This week of the four homes sold in Stow (as reported by the Stow Sentry), one was sold through Sheriff's sale, and the other a bank. This nearly 50-50 trend between private sellers and foreclosures has been going on for some time. Doesn't bode will for Stow. Killing homeowners with backbreaking taxes is going to backfire. We are near or at the tipping point.
Mike Barnes
3:31 pm on Monday, November 14, 2011
Misty -- look -- its OK. The take away is you can either be part of a real solution or you can be part of the problem! Criticism without a willingness to sponsor action which can change the real issue (state funding for schools) is really nothing more than intellectual masturbation. It may be fun and safe to sit in front of a computer and bang out what many seem to think are whinny, wallowing in self pity type comments. I guess what I am saying is rather than bash the people who believe in the monetary needs of our schools and those who run them – why not start a letter writing campaign to our state reps. Why not suggest they find a District Judge who would issue bench warrants for our legislators hauling their backsides into court to explain why they have not enacted a funding plan as outlined in the DeRolph case before the Ohio Supreme Court in 1997. Why not get involved to solve the real problem? I and others have written letters – do you want to join us in writing to the people we elected to represent us or would you rather look at the world ………….. well you know!
Misty Pawlin
6:38 pm on Monday, November 14, 2011
@ Mike Barnes : You said, "Criticism without a willingness to sponsor action which can change the real issue (state funding for schools) is really nothing more than **intellectual masturbation ** (got a laugh out of that turn of phrase!). It may be fun and safe to sit in front of a computer and bang out what many seem to think are whinny, wallowing in self pity type comments..."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Let the heartless "many" think as they will. You and others have been sitting in front of your keyboards banging out cruel, insensitive and inappropriate comments to down and out people who don't agree with you. What you see as, "whinny, wallowing in self pity type comments", are the reality for many of us. Far from wallowing in self pity, I am using my considerable skills to stay afloat. I can stretch a dollar farther than just about anyone you ever met. You have far more of a vested interest to keep the schools at their current level of service than I, so it's time for YOU to stop diddling, and get busy!.
I have no interest at the state level to enact more taxes to pay for the schools. The public school system as we know it has become a bloated, out of control monster. Less spending is what is needed, and maybe - dare I say it- more parental responsibility. Fiscal responsibility is the watchword of the day.
Mike Barnes
3:35 pm on Monday, November 14, 2011
Misty -- Times are tough for most of us and tougher for some as well – those people fall in the 10% who vote NO for personal reasons. The voting model I described is well known in one form or another. I would like to claim credit for it and the 80/20 rule which also applies here --- 80% of the work is done by 20% of the people!!! My personal favorite relates to volunteers – The most organized person with the least amount of free time will find the time to help with projects they feel are worthy and important. I am OK with looking bad to people with a negative view. Take care & do us all a favor and write some letters to the people who can make some real changes to get the Ohio school funding train wreck back on track
Mike Barnes
9:28 am on Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Misty -- I really hope it all works out for you.