.

What Happened at the Jan. 10, 2013 City Council Meeting

At-large councilman Mike Rasor shares his notes from the January 10, 2013 meeting of Stow City Council.

 

City council had one of its longest meetings during my tenure tonight. In particular, there were extensive discussions on the crematory, auto sales rezoning and employee raises. My notes are below:

MAYOR’S SPEECH — Mayor Drew gave her State of the City address. She pointed out some of the ways that our government has cut spending, including by reducing the workforce by one-fifth since 2008. The city has also found ways to raise additional revenue without causing additional tax burden to Stow families. Namely, Stow entered into a long-term lease with Enviroscience with respect to the Parks building, and Stow now conducts building inspections for Munroe Falls and Peninsula.

EMPLOYEE PAY RAISES — The city council chambers were packed for the zoning issues. But those weren’t the issues with the most potential to affect the average Stow resident.

Allow me to backup a few steps: On October 31, I received a threatening letter from five city employees. They claimed to be underpaid, and demanded a resolution by December 1. They threatened to file an EEOC claim unless 13 employees got raises — raises that were retroactive to 2008 (yeah, I’m serious).

Tonight, city council gave these 13 employees the raises they demanded on a going-forward basis. It was a 5-2 vote (Riehl, Rasor). The raises will cost about $45,000 per year, so it’s not a large portion of our budget. But it’s bigger than that…

First, we did not obtain a release of civil liability. I made a motion to require a release of liability before the raises kick in. In other words, before we give raises, the employees should have to agree that they won’t sue the city over back wages that they were demanding. The motion failed 4-3 (Riehl, Rasor, Lowdermilk). Maybe it’s because I’m a business lawyer, who errs on the side of caution, but come on! Taxpayers could be on the hook for $200,000 (and maybe $50,000 in legal fees). To that, a majority of council just shrugged.

Second, there is principle involved. We are setting lousy precedent by gladly giving in when the word “attorney” or “EEOC claim” is involved. It’s not how you run a business, and it’s not how you act as a steward of the people’s money.

I’m disappointed. Council did the wrong thing here. I hope it won’t come back to bite us.

CREMATORY – Take a deep breath (of mercury-free air); there will be no crematory in Stow....

 

CLICK HERE TO READ THE REST OF MIKE’S BLOG POST

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Dev January 14, 2013 at 02:35 PM
Wow Retroactive raises to 2008!!!! Well as a private sector tax payer.. I'm going to walk into my CEO's office this morning and demand the same. I'll throw in a threatening letter stating I'm underpaid. I don't care if economy is terrible and we have to settle for poor growth, increasing healthcare and material costs as the new "normal" . . When I get fired......will the Stow City Council waive my property taxes for next 4 years. Shrugg once to approve!! (BTW a job at the city will be nice ..I'll need one after my unemployment benefits run out) If these government employees feel that are underpaid they sould find another better paying job. I'm sure other communities and private sector companies are standing in line to pay them what they are demanding if they are worth it. (I have had to do the same thing a few times during the last 25 years. ) I'm sure we can find a dozen qualified un-employed/under employed people in Stow who would love to work for the city, after a little training I'm sure we will back to normal operations in a few months.
Mary Bednar January 14, 2013 at 09:35 PM
They are not retroactive to 2008. They are effective Jan. 2013. The legislation that calculated the minimum and maximum pay rates was from 2008. That is when the rest of the city's non-bargaining personal got their raises to the minimum. These 13 were left out for 4 years.
Mary Bednar January 14, 2013 at 09:35 PM
Personel not personal

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »