.

What Happened at the Dec. 10, 2012 Stow City Council Meeting

At-large councilman Mike Rasor shares his notes from the December 10, 2012 meeting of the committees of Stow City Council.

We had an unusual set of committee meetings tonight. My notes are posted below:

Crematories

The longest part of the night was spent discussing the proposal to allow crematories where funeral homes are permitted. A great deal of concerned residents and supporters of Bruce Redmon spoke.

I have a four thoughts on this issue:

1) My position is clear: Based upon the scientific evidence (in fact, the expert put forth by the Redmons), I will not support the release of fine particulate matter of human remains in a residential setting. I’ll be happy to support Mr. Redmon leasing property in an industrial area — just not so close to families.

2) A former candidate for city council spoke and tried to politicize the matter. She (Annie Hanson) implied that my vote would be motivated by politics. Of course, it’s not. Her attitude is the same kind of nonsense is so pervasive in Washington D.C. right now. I suspect she will run again for office at some point. But I don’t see how anyone could support her with that kind of politics-first attitude.

3) I cringed when I heard each variation of this statement tonight: “Council should support Mr. Redmon because he has been a good friend to the community.” I agree that Bruce is a generous and caring person, but no one gets extra consideration because of what clubs he belongs to, or what cause he has donated to, or who his friends are. That’s the Good Ole Boy Network mentality that I have strived to defeat (and we have it on the ropes!). We, as leaders, vote for what’s right, not for who supports the most fundraisers. Period. These residents have invested their lives in their real estate, and I won’t stand for arguments that a business owner should get preference based on how involved he is in the community. (I don’t blame Bruce for these arguments, because he has never implied it, and nor would he.)

4) To be candid with you, I don’t know whether this legislation will pass. It will probably be a 4-3 vote, one way or the other.

Other matters

– You may have heard the rumor: Panera Bread is moving into the former lot of Bob’s Big Boy, near the Route 8/Graham Road ramp. Adjacent to the building will be retail space. One councilmember asked the property owner about what would be located in the retail space. In a moment of much-needed levity, the property owner said, “It will not be a crematory.” … In seriousness, he has not found a tenant for the retail space, but it probably won’t be another restaurant.

– And then, the meeting started to get weird …

CLICK HERE TO READ THE REST OF MIKE’S POST

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Larry Kinnan December 11, 2012 at 03:17 PM
Once again Mr. Rasor cuts through all the politics and rhetoric to state the case against adding a crematorium adjacent to a residential area. It is unfortunate that that Ms. Hanson chose to use this issue as an opening volley for this fall's election. Contrary to what has been expressed in the media, Stow residents are not hostile to business but are protective of their private property rights which is what the Founding Fathers felt was a cornerstone of our democracy.
Jack Kelly December 13, 2012 at 11:48 AM
You just never stop, do you? Never stop proving what a complete joke you are in this city. No wonder the floor was wiped with you in the election. You're as much of a joke as Ms. Hanson. I find it nothing short of laughable that you played someone writing a letter to the editor as being "expressed in media." Yet, you provide NO SUBSTANTIATED FACTS to support your drama-queen responses (as clearly noted by your statements of "too many unknowns". BULL!). And this whole "property rights" thing is a bunch of bunk. Again, nothing proven with SUBSTANTIATED FACTS. And nitpicking ONE piece of data in California that has no relevance just makes you -- and people like you -- more foolish. But then again, that's a great thing about one's right to free speech. People like you have that right to spout your unsubstantiated and uneducated ramblings all you want. Just like people like me have a right to ridicule you for said ignorance/stupidity.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something